RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 from Savas Parastatidis on 2004-07-13 (www-ws-desc@w3.org from July 2004)

From: Savas Parastatidis <Savas.Parastatidis@newcastle.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 23:57:01 +0100
To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <37E80E80B681A24B8F768D607373CA800103DA83@largo.campus.ncl.ac.uk>

> > We do need a MANDATORY extension in WSDL which exposes what the
client
> > must to for dispatch. It is necessary for the contract.
> 
> We do *not* need to indicate the method of dispatch in the WSDL.  The
WSDL
> *must* indicate what information and metadata must be included in the
> message and its protocol envelope.  What the service uses that
metadata or
> information for has *nothing* to do with the contract.
> 
> Amy!

      1
 +   11
+++   1
 +    1
      1
    11111

:-)

.savas.


(only for those who use fixed-width font :-)

Received on Tuesday, 13 July 2004 18:57:11 UTC