W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > July 2004

RE: Revised Asynch Binding

From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 13:47:22 +0100
Message-ID: <2B7789AAED12954AAD214AEAC13ACCEF1A03305A@i2km02-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net>
To: <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>, <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

Ugo wrote:
> Correlation could also be based on particular content of the 
> exchanged message having some business significance, for example 
> request and response sharing the same value for the purchase order. 
> This is a mechanism used extensively in BPEL, for example, and is 
> independent from the addressing mechanism used.

This seems to be another much higher level of correlation than required
just to group messages into a single WSDL MEP. Maybe it's just the words 
"business significance" and "BPEL", but this does sound more like a 
choreography or work-flow to me - something more usually layered above 
several operations and beyond the scope of a WSDL correlation "feature".

Received on Monday, 12 July 2004 08:47:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:06:43 UTC