W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > July 2004

RE: absolute vs. relative URIs?

From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 08:39:19 +0100
Message-ID: <2B7789AAED12954AAD214AEAC13ACCEF2709D9F6@i2km02-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net>
To: <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
+1 so long as we're only talking about namespace URIs 
ie. not URIs that resolve to a document (ok i'm ignoring RDDL)

	-----Original Message----- 
	From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org on behalf of Sanjiva Weerawarana 
	Sent: Fri 02/07/2004 07:12 
	To: www-ws-desc@w3.org 
	Subject: absolute vs. relative URIs?

	In editing @style I noticed that we don't say "absolute URI"
	there .. and in a few other places. We do say it in some
	It seems to me that all URIs *except* import/@location and
	include/@location MUST absolutely be absolute. Those two MAY
	be absolute or relative. I see no value in allowing relative
	URIs for the others.
	If you agree +1 it please .. I'll fix the wording then.

Received on Friday, 2 July 2004 03:39:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:06:42 UTC