Fw: Minutes, 24 June 2004 WS Desc telcon

I forgot to send this to the list ..

Sanjiva.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
To: "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>; <paul.downey@bt.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 8:36 PM
Subject: Re: Minutes, 24 June 2004 WS Desc telcon


> I looked at the minutes of the telecon where this was decided.
> 
> Wow, incredible. I see most people talking saying "use one value
> for style" and then we take a vote and voila .. its multiple
> values. Sigh.
> 
> Yes the position is clear: multiple values and the order of the
> values means nothing. I infer from that that there is no priority.
> 
> No need to discuss this again .. if I have trouble with the writeup
> I'll pipe up again.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Sanjiva.
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
> To: <paul.downey@bt.com>; <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
> Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 1:06 AM
> Subject: RE: Minutes, 24 June 2004 WS Desc telcon
> 
> 
> > Did this answer your question?
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org]
> > On
> > > Behalf Of paul.downey@bt.com
> > > Sent: Friday, June 25, 2004 11:49 AM
> > > To: sanjiva@watson.ibm.com; www-ws-desc@w3.org
> > > Subject: RE: Minutes, 24 June 2004 WS Desc telcon
> > > 
> > > Issue 98?
> > > http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/%7Echeckout%7E/2002/ws/desc/issues/wsd-
> > > issues.html#x98
> > > 
> > > if so, this might help:
> > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Jun/0084.html
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org on behalf of Sanjiva
> > Weerawarana
> > > Sent: Fri 25/06/2004 18:33
> > > To: Web Services Description
> > > Cc:
> > > Subject: Re: Minutes, 24 June 2004 WS Desc telcon
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > ?ED       2004-06-17: Editor action to check that multiple
> > style
> > > >                       values are allowed.
> > > 
> > > The current draft does not allow it.
> > > 
> > > Can someone please point me to the record of the decision? I'm
> > > hoping that'll say what needs to be written about the ordering/
> > > priority of multiple URIs etc..
> > > 
> > > Sanjiva.
> > > 
> > >

Received on Friday, 2 July 2004 02:38:24 UTC