- From: Jonathan Marsh <jonmarsh@pacbell.net>
- Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 14:09:41 -0800
- To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Dial in information (members only) [0]:
[0] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2002Oct/0058.html
See the public WG page [1] for pointers to current documents and other
information, and the private page [2] for administrative matters.
[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/
[2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/admin
If you have additions to the agenda, please email them to the WG list
before the start of the telcon.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Agenda
1. Assign scribe. Lucky minute taker for this week is:
Steve Tuecke (fallbacks Don Wright, Glen Daniels, Kevin Liu, Allen
Brookes)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Approval of minutes of Oct 24 telcon [3]
[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Oct/0119.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Review of Action items.
? 2002-09-10: Sanjiva to prodice a proposal for equivalence of
top-level components.
? 2002-09-10: Gudge, jeffsch, roberto et al to write proposal
to replace message with complexType [due this week]
FTF 2002-09-10: Gudge to provide summary of using W3C XML Schema
to wrap other type systems at an appropriate level
of abstraction.
FTF 2002-09-11: Jeffrey, DonM to define TCP binding.
FTF 2002-09-19: Joyce, Sandeep, Igor, Steve T, Sanjiva, Adi,
Roberto, Amy to form task force to prepare
presentation on adding pub/sub as first class to
WSDL 1.2.
? 2002-09-19: Sanjiva to write a Java binding.
? 2002-10-10: Gudge to roll port type inheritance into the main
branch, adding an issue that we need to resolve the
name issue and also the issue for promoting
operations to the top level.
FTF 2002-10-10: Gudge to prepare proposal for promoting operations
to the top level.
? 2002-10-10: Roberto to see how this might affect the feature
proposal. Glen to review.
? 2002-10-17: Gudge, ALewis to make proposal for language
describing schema extensibility, and for using
xs:import/xs:schema as examples of this.
? 2002-10-10: Gudge to prepare proposal for promoting operations.
[To be done by end of week.]
? 2002-10-10: Roberto to see how this might affect the feature
proposal. Glen to review this.
? 2002-10-17: Gudge and A. Lewis to make a proposal for
describing xs:import and (apparently) xs:schema
as "required" extensibility elements.
DONE [4] 2002-10-24: JMarsh to provide document ready for publication
next week, to be voted on by WG.
? 2002-10-24: Sanjiva to act as issues editor, create document
for tracking issues.
? 2002-10-24: DBooth to discuss scenarios for embed/import of
schemas in primer.
? 2002-10-24: Jacek to provide commentary/response to Arthur's
identification by URI proposal.
[4] http://www.w3.org/TR/ws-desc-reqs/
--------------------------------------------------------------------
4. FTF preparations.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Requirements doc published [5]
[5] http://www.w3.org/TR/ws-desc-reqs/
--------------------------------------------------------------------
6. New Issues
a. wsdl-bindings example needs fixing [6] (Chris Ferris, issue #10?)
b. extends attribute optional [7] (Kevin Liu)
[6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Oct/0130.html
[7] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Oct/0139.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------
7. Importing Schema into WSDL
Two alternative proposals. Two elements [8] or one [9].
[8] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Oct/0067.html
[9] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Oct/0114.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------
8. Identification of a Service [10] / Arthur's [11] identification
proposal [12].
[10] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2002Oct/0017.html
(members only)
[11] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Oct/0084.html
[12]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Oct/att-0084/01-URI-
References.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------
9. Modest proposal (DavidB) [13]
Relevant TAG issue [14]
[13] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wsdl-semantics-dbooth/semantics_clean.htm
[14] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#namespaceDocument-8
--------------------------------------------------------------------
10. A slice at a proposal for SOAP features/properties in WSDL [15].
Canon's change requests [16]. Amy's comments [17]. Tibco proposal
(revised) [18]. Tibco SOAP email binding [19].
[15] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Sep/0004.html
[16] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Sep/0080.html
[17] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Oct/0104.html
[18] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Oct/0149.html
[19] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Oct/0126.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------
11. Rationale for dropping the <soap:body use=...> attribute [23]
Proposal from Jacek on better describing the extensibility
mechanism to support other languages. [24]
[23] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Sep/0054.html
[24] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Oct/0040.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------
12. BindingType proposal from Kevin [25].
Awaiting further work on Part 2 AM.
[25] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Aug/0009.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------
13. Issue 2: SOAPAction has been deprecated, as of SOAP 1.2 [26].
Jean-Jacques proposal at [27].
Jacek's addendum at [28].
Dependent upon Glen's feature/property proposal.
[26] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x2
[27] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Sep/0050.html
[28] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Sep/0056.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------
14. Issue 28: transport='uri' [29]
Dependent upon Glen's feature/property proposal.
[29] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x28
--------------------------------------------------------------------
15. HTTP Binding Issues (6a, 41)
Jeffrey recommends no change [30].
Sanjiva is mulling this over [31].
Dependent upon Glen's feature/property proposal.
[30] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0102.html
[31] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jul/0067.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------
16. Issue 25: Interaction between W3C XML Schema and SOAP Data Model
Gudge's explains at [32], Roberto's options at [33].
Waiting for more detail in ACM?
[32] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0186.html
[33] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jul/0071.html
- Jonathan
Received on Wednesday, 30 October 2002 17:10:12 UTC