- From: Duane Nickull <duane@xmlglobal.com>
- Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2003 09:05:28 -0800
- To: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
- Cc: "'Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler)'" <RogerCutler@ChevronTexaco.com>, www-ws-arch@w3.org
Yes - thus the caveat. I am still feeling out the uber-question within this group that faces all architectures - How do you add enough constraints to make the architecture effective without unnecessarily limiting the implementations? If "receive and event" is too far into implementation, then the alternative wording is fine with me. I did note however, that this group uses the term "Reference Architecture" which to me means more prescriptive. "Able to determine" works. Duane David Orchard wrote: > Personally, I think Duane's definition goes to far into design. "receive an > event" is design, whereas "able to determine" is a requirement. > > Cheers, > Dave -- VP Strategic Relations, Technologies Evangelist XML Global Technologies **************************** ebXML software downloads - http://www.xmlglobal.com/prod/
Received on Wednesday, 5 March 2003 12:05:30 UTC