RE: FW: Reliable Messaging Summary

Hi,
I tiotally agree here.
 
abbie

-----Original Message-----
From: Christopher B Ferris [mailto:chrisfer@us.ibm.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 11:10 AM
To: Geoff Arnold
Cc: Martin Chapman; www-ws-arch@w3.org; www-ws-arch-request@w3.org
Subject: Re: FW: Reliable Messaging Summary



+1 

Christopher Ferris
Architect, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture
email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
phone: +1 508 234 3624 



Geoff Arnold <Geoff.Arnold@Sun.COM> 
Sent by: www-ws-arch-request@w3.org 


03/05/2003 10:26 AM 


To
Martin Chapman <martin.chapman@oracle.com> 

cc
www-ws-arch@w3.org 

Subject
Re: FW: Reliable Messaging Summary

	





+1

On Wednesday, March 5, 2003, at 10:09  AM, Martin Chapman wrote:
> agreed but the mechanism for describing and negotiating should not be
> specific to reliability. Other qualtities can use the same framework,
> and dare I suggest a ws-policy like
> framework needs to be part of our architecture.