RE: please review staging drafts from Martin Duerst on 2004-01-29 (www-webont-wg@w3.org from January 2004)

From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 11:57:36 -0500
To: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "Sandro Hawke" <sandro@w3.org>, "Ian Horrocks" <horrocks@cs.man.ac.uk>
Cc: <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.J.20040129115447.07994ed8@localhost>

Hello Jeremy,

The Japanese shows without problems. But that's not due to the
fact that the encoding is correct, it's due to the fact that
the source uses numeric character references. This is a pity
because the file is served as UTF-8, and so the characters
could be represented directly. I hope you can fix this,
I can help you.

Regards,    Martin.


     &lt;first:ShakespearePlay rdf:ID="Romeo-and-Juliet"&gt;

       &lt;rdfs:label xml:lang="en"&gt;Romeo and Juliet&lt;/rdfs:label&gt;
       &lt;rdfs:comment xml:lang="en"&gt;The Most Excellent and Lamentable 
Tragedy
           of Romeo and Juliet.&lt;/rdfs:comment&gt;
       &lt;rdfs:label xml:lang="it"&gt;Romeo e Giulietta&lt;/rdfs:label&gt;
       &lt;rdfs:comment xml:lang="it"&gt;La tragedia di Romeo e 
Giulietta&lt;/rdfs:comment&gt;

       &lt;rdfs:label rdf:parseType="Literal"
           &gt;&lt;span 
xml:lang="ja"&gt;&#12525;&#12511;&#12458;&#12392;&#12472;&#12517;&#12522;&#1 
2456;&#12483;&#12488;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/rdfs:label&gt;
       &lt;rdfs:comment rdf:parseType="Literal"
           &gt;&lt;span 
xml:lang="ja"&gt;&#12525;&#12511;&#12458;&#12392;&#12472;&#12517;&#12522;&#1 
2456;&#12483;&#12488;&#12398;&lt;ruby&gt;&lt;rbc&gt;&lt;rb&gt;&#24754;&lt;/r 
b&gt;&lt;rb&gt;&#21127;&lt;/rb&gt;&lt;/rbc&gt;

           &lt;rtc&gt;&lt;rt&gt;&#12402;&lt;/rt&gt;&lt;rt&gt;&#12370;&#12365; 
&lt;rtc&gt;&lt;rt&gt;&#12402;&lt;/rt&gt;&lt;rt&gt;&#12370;&#12365;&lt;/rt&gt; 
&lt;/rtc&gt;&lt;/ruby&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/rdfs:comment&gt;
     &lt;/first:ShakespearePlay&gt;


At 17:07 04/01/29 +0100, Jeremy Carroll wrote:

>I was anxious concerning the test misc-201, with the Japanese characters in
>it. You have changed the encoding, I assume in a way that works, but it
>would be good to have someone proof read who can understand Japanese.
>
>http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/TR/STAGE-owl-test/misc-200-xmlliteral#misce
>llaneous-201
>
>(cc-ing Martin D��st ...)
>
>Jeremy
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: www-webont-wg-request@w3.org
> > [mailto:www-webont-wg-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Sandro Hawke
> > Sent: 29 January 2004 16:53
> > To: Ian Horrocks
> > Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
> > Subject: Re: please review staging drafts
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > One funny in owl-semantics-semantics-all.html - the table
> > > "Characteristics of OWL classes, datatypes, and properties" in Section
> > > 5 is showing some non-existent differences. This doesn't show up in
> > > the compound document version, and I assume it is just a minor glitch in
> > > the comparison (maybe white space or something).
> >
> > In case you're curious: it's showing an encoding change, from the
> > single character at code point 215 to the character string "&#215;",
> > which should have the same affect on browsers, but is independent of
> > the encoding of the document.  ("tidy" with the "-n" option does this
> > transformation.)  On some of the documents I used that approach; then
> > I switched to using UTF-8 via "iconv".
> >
> > > Of course we are still engaged in a debate about some minor changes
> > > requested by Herman and Jeremy, but I hope that this will be resolved
> > > in this evening's teleconf.
> >
> > Yep.
> >
> >     -- sandro
> >
> >

Received on Thursday, 29 January 2004 11:58:12 UTC