- From: Ian Horrocks <horrocks@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 16:16:37 +0000
- To: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
On January 29, Jeremy Carroll writes: > > > Ian, > > just, clarifying a small ambiguity on XMLLiteral > > > > > > ACTION: Ian to find a better phrasing to adapt/clarify the > > > specification if necessary. > > > > Current proposal from me - agree with Jeremy's proposed change to Test > > and no change to S&AS. > > > > (unfortunately I am so fickle that "Jeremy's proposed change" could mean > almost anyhting!) > > I take you to mean only the modification to test misc-205 (one word) not the > bigger change that was in my December "Possible compromise" i.e. I meant the one word modification to test misc-205. Ian > > ===== > OWL Test > a) > Section 4.2.2 > http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/PR-owl-test-20031215/#consistencyChecker > Add between the definition of "OWL Full consistency checker" and "complete > OWL Lite consistency checker" a new paragraph as follows. > [[ > The datatype map of an OWL Full consistency checker MUST also support > rdf:XMLLiteral from [RDF Concepts]. > ]] > > ====== > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Dec/0100.html > > > Jeremy
Received on Thursday, 29 January 2004 11:22:04 UTC