- From: Masahiro Hori <HORIM@jp.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 11:10:45 +0900
- To: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@swi.psy.uva.nl>
- Cc: WebOnt WG <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Guus,
A document for XML Presentation Syntax now available and reday for
review [1]. This document is for W3C's Note [2] (not for LC/CR).
However, the XML syntax came from one of the OWL requirement [3],
it would make sense if it comes out at the same time as with the other
OWL documents.
Could you put this on the agenda for "3. DOCUMENT STATUS" ?
-Masahiro
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Mar/0047.html
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Jan/0159.html
[3] http://www.w3.org/TR/webont-req/#req-xml-syntax
Masahiro Hori, Ph.D.
Group Leader, Programming Models & Tools,
IBM Tokyo Research Laboratory
Tel: +81-46-215-4667 / Fax: +81-46-274-4282
Email: horim@jp.ibm.com
Guus Schreiber
<schreiber@swi.ps To: WebOnt WG <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
y.uva.nl> cc:
Sent by: Subject: WOWG: agenda March 13 telecon
www-webont-wg-req
uest@w3.org
2003/03/13 01:12
WEB ONTOLOGY WORKING GROUP
AGENDA/LOGISTICS
March 13, 2003
1200 US East Coast
0900 US West Coast
1700 London
0200 Tokyo (next day)
Duration: 60-90 minutes
PHONE INFORMATION
To use Zakim:
Dial +1.617.761.6200
At the "enter your passcode followed by the pound key" message,
enter 9326#.
Note: When you join the telecon please state your name
CHAT INFO
Simultaneous IRC Chat
irc:irc.w3.org (port 6665)
#webont
Chair: Guus Schreiber
Scribe: Herman ter Horst
1) ADMIN (10-15 min)
1.1 Role Call
Regrets: Hendler, Obrst, Wallace
See list archive for last-minute regrets
1.2 Approval of Minutes of last telecon
PROPOSED to accept the following as a true record of Feb 27:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0402.html
1.3 Agenda Amendments
1.4 Telecon Schedule
Next telecon: March 20
Scribe: TBD
2 ISSUE & ISSUETTES (30-35 min)
2.1 ISSUE 5.26 OWL DL Syntax
Context:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/webont-issues.html#I5.26-OWLDLSyntax
PROPOSAL to RESOLVE [consensus from editors meetings]:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Mar/0066.html
See also message from Peter about new S&AS editor's draft:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Mar/0064.html
ACTIONS from editors meeting:
ACTION Peter, Jeremy:
Check the "no acylicity constraint" in owl:disjointWith
ACTION Peter, Jeremy:
review rdf:first and rdf:rest in annotations
ACTION Peter:
remove restrictions with n=0
DONE
ACTION: Guus:
remove subProperty relationship between owl:priorVersion and
owl:backwardsCompatibleWith and owl:incompatibleWith
DONE
ACTION: Guus:
correct ontology domain and range constraints for owl:imports in owl.owl.
DONE
ACTION: Jeremy:
generate domain and range constraints test cases for owl:imports
ACTION Peter:
check modifying rdf exclusion to a list of excluded items.
ACTION Peter and Jeremy:
discuss unnamed individuals.
DONE
Discussed netween Peter and Jeremy: proposed to disallow them in sameAs and
differentFrom statements.
ACTION: Peter"
allow optional objectProperty typing for special categories of object
properties.
ACTION: Peter, Jeremy:
Peter to add triple table of Jeremy's after Jeremy updates.
ACTION: Peter/Ian.
Check whther naming enumerated datatypes generates problems
ACTION: Guus.
Add words to reference if change.
2.2 XMLLieteral in OWL DL
Issuette by Carroll:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Jan/0488.html
Request to RDF Core:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0076.html
Discussiopn notes at editors meeting (see Item 3):
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Mar/0038.html
Reasons againts from Volz:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Mar/0035.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Mar/0039.html
2.3 owl.owl
Message from Guus:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Mar/0068.html
Replies from Hendler, Carroll:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Mar/0071.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Mar/0069.html
Message from public comments list:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Mar/0006.html
Discussion topics:
- is owl.owl normative?
- explicit import expected?
- different versions for OWL Full/DL/Lite?
- use OWL to define OWL?
3. DOCUMENT STATUS (30-35 min.)
For all docs discuss:
- status & outstanding actions
- editing/review effort required for LC
ACTION all editors: include member list in ack section
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0223.html
3.1 Use Cases and Requiremnents
http://www.cse.lehigh.edu/~heflin/webont/reqdoc/
3.2 Overview
http://www.ksl.stanford.edu/people/dlm/webont/OWLFeatureSynopsis.htm
ACTION: Deb to add a paragraph on RDFS vs. OWL Lite to Overview doc.
3.3 Guide
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/guide-src/Guide.html
ACTION: pfps to send Mike S. answer re: anootation questions
3.4 Reference
ACTION: Jeremy/HP review Reference
ACTION: Evan and Mike Dean to take MIME type and produce MIME type
doc
ACTION: Jeremy to update discussion of relation between RDFS and OWL
Lite, give quick comments.
ACTION: Guus to review, add to the Reference document as Appendix.
ACTION: Jim, Pat to review
3.5 S&AS
http://www-db.research.bell-labs.com/user/pfps/owl/
3.6 Test Cases
ACTION: Ian will look at section 4.2.2 of Test editor's draft and
propose some wording for what is expected of datatypes
DONE:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Mar/0045.html
3.7 Planning for LC
- strawpoll on LC decision
- timeline ofr LC Candidates
4. AOB (0-5 min.)
--
A. Th. Schreiber, SWI, University of Amsterdam,
http://www.swi.psy.uva.nl/usr/Schreiber/home.html
Received on Wednesday, 12 March 2003 21:25:27 UTC