- From: Ludger van Elst <elst@dfki.uni-kl.de>
- Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 10:39:41 +0100
- To: www-webont-wg@w3.org
Hi Webont-Members, > "what is an ontology?" stuff in requirements abstract/intro > From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> ... > let's > see if there's some text to grab... yes: > > Put simply, an ontology is just a set of > standard vocabularly terms along with some > formal definitions of the terms. > > Lightly edited: > > An ontology is vocabularly of terms along > with some formal definitions of the terms. I am a little bit surprised that - though nearly all papers about ontologies refer to Tom Gruber´s "shared conceptualization" definition - all proposals in this group only capture the "conceptualization" aspect but don´t mention the "sharing" aspect. In the requirements document there is a paragraph titled "3.1 Shared Ontologies" which would - accepting Tom's definition - expand to "3.1 Shared Shared Conceptualizations". In my opinion, a good definition of the term ontology should cover both aspects, sharing and conceptualizing. Otherwise, we should consequently only talk about conceptualizations (e.g., "A conceptualization is vocabularly of terms along with some formal definitions of the terms."), not ontologies. What do you think about this topic? Best regards, Ludger ______________________________________________________________________ Ludger van Elst Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Künstliche Intelligenz GmbH Erwin-Schrödinger-Straße Geb. 57/377, D-67608 Kaiserslautern, Germany Tel. : 0631 205-3474 E-mail: elst@dfki.uni-kl.de WWW : http://www.dfki.uni-kl.de/~elst/ ______________________________________________________________________
Received on Thursday, 14 February 2002 04:36:50 UTC