- From: Dieter Fensel <dieter@cs.vu.nl>
- Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 06:31:00 +0100
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, www-webont-wg@w3.org
At 06:56 PM 2/13/2002 -0500, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: >Here are my current thoughts on why OWL should not use the same syntax as >RDF, no matter what we do with the semantics. Hi Peter, basically it sounds like that we are now quite close to solve the semantical problems and we can now start the really interesting and exciting discussion about the right syntax. Dieter ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- WARNING: I receive more than 100 emails per day WARNING: and brake down in answering them timely, WARNING: if ever. Sorry, Dieter :-( ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Dieter Fensel Division of Mathematics & Computer Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1081a, 1081 HV Amsterdam, NL The Netherlands Tel. (mobil): +31-(0)6-51850619, Fax and Answering machine: +31-(0)84-872 27 22 Email: dieter@cs.vu.nl ICQ #132755538 http://www.google.com/search?q=dieter or http://www.fensel.com Privat: Liendenhof 64, NL-1108 HB Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Tel.: +31-(0)20-365 52 60. ---------------------------------------------------------------- The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.
Received on Thursday, 14 February 2002 08:23:48 UTC