- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 13 Feb 2002 22:44:12 -0600
- To: "Peter F. "Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
On Wed, 2002-02-13 at 17:56, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: [...] > Why Triples are Terrible for Syntax [...the suspence builds...] > None of the above problems are really solvable using RDF triples. A much > better syntax carrier would allow syntax to be represented as tuples or, > even better, as trees. Bummer. I was all set to say "yes, that's a much better alternative!" But I don't see an alternative. Oh well... there's always tomorrow... -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 13 February 2002 23:43:51 UTC