Re: UPDATE: why RDF syntax is not suitable for OWL

On Wed, 2002-02-13 at 17:56, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
[...]
> 		Why Triples are Terrible for Syntax
[...the suspence builds...]
> None of the above problems are really solvable using RDF triples.  A much
> better syntax carrier would allow syntax to be represented as tuples or,
> even better, as trees.

Bummer. I was all set to say "yes, that's a much better alternative!"

But I don't see an alternative.

Oh well... there's always tomorrow...

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/

Received on Wednesday, 13 February 2002 23:43:51 UTC