- From: Frank van Harmelen <Frank.van.Harmelen@cs.vu.nl>
- Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 23:11:42 +0100
- To: www-webont-wg@w3.org
Jim Hendler wrote: > If the WG indicates that they agree with Peter and/or prefer this decision, > I will be willing to revisit our decision. If not, then we can go to LC > without the semantics document, and resolve this and release that document > in LC form as soon thereafter as we can If you're looking for support, than count me in as follows: - I support Peter's objection (that last night's resolution lets "assertional content" creep into descriptions) - even if the semantics document could be fixed, it would still be unattractive (Peter Crowther's points on this were well made) - going to LC without the semantics document would be unacceptable in my opinion. My first preference is Peter's proposal and I would rather not have unique-names construction at all, rather than going to LC without a semantics document. Frank. ----
Received on Friday, 20 December 2002 17:11:05 UTC