- From: Smith, Michael K <michael.smith@eds.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 16:57:37 -0600
- To: Frank van Harmelen <Frank.van.Harmelen@cs.vu.nl>, www-webont-wg@w3.org
If you are taking a straw poll, I agree with Frank. - Mike -----Original Message----- From: Frank van Harmelen [mailto:Frank.van.Harmelen@cs.vu.nl] Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 4:12 PM To: www-webont-wg@w3.org Subject: Re: oneOfDistinct, a proposal for 5.18 Jim Hendler wrote: > If the WG indicates that they agree with Peter and/or prefer this decision, > I will be willing to revisit our decision. If not, then we can go to LC > without the semantics document, and resolve this and release that document > in LC form as soon thereafter as we can If you're looking for support, than count me in as follows: - I support Peter's objection (that last night's resolution lets "assertional content" creep into descriptions) - even if the semantics document could be fixed, it would still be unattractive (Peter Crowther's points on this were well made) - going to LC without the semantics document would be unacceptable in my opinion. My first preference is Peter's proposal and I would rather not have unique-names construction at all, rather than going to LC without a semantics document. Frank. ----
Received on Friday, 20 December 2002 17:57:45 UTC