On Wednesday 18 July 2001 18:53, Terje Bless wrote: > BTW, I seem to recall that the conclusion to that thread was that these > characters are actually invalid in HTML 4, but _valid_ in XHTML (since XML > 1.0 SE removed the word "graphic" from "any valid graphic character"). They're definitely invalid in HTML 4; the debate (on which there isn't consensus) is whether they are valid in XHTML 1. They're not apparently invalid in XML _en_ _générale_. However, I believe they are invalid in XHTML, too. The SGML declaration for XHTML [1] gives: DESCSET 0 9 UNUSED 9 2 9 11 2 UNUSED 13 1 13 14 18 UNUSED 32 95 32 127 1 UNUSED 128 32 UNUSED That means characters 127-159 decimal are invalid, just like in HTML, right? > Did > I read that wrong or are we actually failing in _both_ HTML and XHTML? I think you're OK w.r.t. XHTML. 1. <http://www.w3.org/TR/html/DTD/xhtml1.dcl> -- Thanasis Kinias Optimal LLC Scottsdale, Arizona, USAReceived on Wednesday, 18 July 2001 22:55:41 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:58:22 UTC