Re: HTML WG ISSUE-41: extensibility

Paul, Sam and Maciej: thank you for the heads-up, and for  the earlier 
announcement of the pruning of the proposed solution space.

TAG members: I will assume, at least for the moment, that you will respond 
to the survey as individuals, if at all.  If you would like to have 
discussion on next week's TAG call, either to analyze the options, or to 
consider a more coordinated TAG response, please let me know, and please 
let's try to have as much of the discussion as possible in email ahead of 
the call.

In short:  unless I hear to the contrary from at least one TAG member, I am 
not likely to schedule formal discussion of this issue in time to impact 
responses to the survey (though I will be quite happy to schedule such 
discussion if asked.)

Thank you.

Noah

On 9/23/2010 2:18 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On 09/22/2010 12:19 AM, Paul Cotton wrote:
>> Update from HTML WG on ISSUE-41:
>> http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/issue-status.html#ISSUE-041
>>
>> The WG is now down to only two change proposals for this issue and a
>> survey of the WG's position on these two remaining change proposals is
>> imminent.
>>
>> Extensions like SVG:
>> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/extensionslikesvg
>> Zero-edit proposal:
>> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/User:Eoconnor/ISSUE-41
>
> We have now issued a survey on the matter:
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Sep/0250.html
> http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-41-objection-poll/
>
> Responses will be accepted until Thursday, October 7th.
>
> - Sam Ruby
>

Received on Thursday, 23 September 2010 18:25:40 UTC