RE: HTML Issues of interest to the TAG

Please note that some of the issues you listed are on this week's HTML WG meeting agenda:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-wg-announce/2010AprJun/0002.html 

>- rel-ownership: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/27

    Issue-27: rel-ownership
    http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/27
    http://www.w3.org/2010/04/08-html-wg-minutes.html#item03
    Last status: "related Internet Draft is not yet progressed and the
      action may not be done if the registry is not yet available"
    Proposal: (briefly) discuss whether we still feel like testing is
      still necessary, and (if so) decide on a new date.

>- urls-webarch: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/56

     Issue 56: urls-webarch
       http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Apr/0312.html
       Would appreciate feedback from the IRIbis WG on Ian's proposed
       changes to the IRI spec.  If these changes are acceptable, a CfC
       with amicable resolution will be issued.

> profile-disambiguation: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/82

     Issue 82: profile-disambiguation
       http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Apr/0306.html
       http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Apr/0384.html
       Joshua has provided a patch for Mozilla, and Ian indicated that
       he was waiting on that, now that it is available, is it time to
       issue a CfC predicated on the removal of the DOM API for the
       profile attribute?

/paulc

Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329

Received on Wednesday, 14 April 2010 23:26:27 UTC