W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > April 2010

HTML Issues of interest to the TAG

From: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 17:31:58 -0400
Message-ID: <4BC3914E.2030406@arcanedomain.com>
To: www-tag@w3.org
Cc: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Sam <rubys@intertwingly.net>
After the TAG F2F, it seemed to me that I need to do a somewhat better 
job of tracking the HTML WG issues of interest to the TAG, and of being 
sure that the HTML chairs are aware of our likely next steps, etc.

With that in mind, I opened up the HTML WG issues status list referenced 
by Paul Cotton at our meeting [1], and I identified the following as 
ones where I either know for a fact that the TAG is active, or else 
suspect that we have an interest:

  - html-versioning: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/4
  - rel-ownership: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/27
  - decentralized-extensibility: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/41
  - urls-webarch: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/56 (how is 
thi s related to urls-terminology: 
http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/78 ?)
  - representation-vs-resource: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/81
  - profile-disambiguation: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/82
  - legacy-doctypes: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/84
  - sniffing-optional: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/104

TAG members, does this list look right to you?  If not, please suggest 
corrections.  If you are inclined to remind me of any pertinent work you 
are doing with the HTML WG, associated TAG actions, etc., so much the 
better (don't bother in cases where it's obvious, e.g. our action 404 
[4] is clearly about HTML Issue 27).  Thanks.


[1] http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/issue-status.html
[2] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/404
Received on Monday, 12 April 2010 21:32:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:56:33 UTC