W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > October 2005

Re: TAG Request for Change to WS Addressing Core

From: Mark Nottingham <mark.nottingham@bea.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 11:49:21 -0700
Message-Id: <DF2F8643-9846-468C-88AA-376318D41F36@bea.com>
Cc: www-tag@w3.org
To: Noah Mendelsohn <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>, Vincent Quint <Vincent.Quint@inrialpes.fr>

Thanks, Noah.

Vincent, I expect that we'll be able to accept comments from the TAG  
after Nov. 1st, as we most likely won't be finished our CR testing at  
that point. However, it won't be much longer before we do, so if the  
TAG would like to make additional comments, it should do so soon.

I'll have a better idea of our schedule after our Nov. 7-9 F2F; if  
you ping me after those dates, I can give you a revised estimate.

Cheers,


On 25/10/2005, at 3:41 PM, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com.bea.com wrote:

> Mark Nottingham writes:
>
>
>> Thank you, Noah; I'll record this as a CR issue and instigate
>> discussion in the WG.
>>
>
> Thank you!
>
>
>> For my information, could you give an indication of the nature
>> and scope of "other aspects of TAG issue endPointRefs-47,"
>>
>
> Sure.  It's our understanding that when Mark Baker raised the issue  
> [1],
> his concern was about the use of addressing at more than one level,  
> I.e.
> in SOAP headers resulting from EPRs and in the native mechanisms of  
> the
> underlying protocols such as HTTP.  Mark has several times reminded us
> [2,3] of the difference between the "don't use non-URI parms for
> identification" and the "don't address at two levels" concerns.   
> So, we're
> at least devoting some more discussion to the "two-level" issue.   
> We have
> not reached even the rough outline of a decision as to whether to do
> anything about that, and if so what.  Right now, it's at the  
> discussion
> stage.
>
>
>> and when you expect to resolve them (even in rough terms)?
>> This will help plan our future work.
>>
>
> I just noticed that your Candidate Rec. comment period closes next  
> week on
> 1 Nov, but as I recall that deadline was not mentioned on our telcon
> today.  I would encourage you to coordinate with Vincent Quint, our  
> chair,
> if you have concerns about the timing of any further TAG work on this
> issue.  Minutes from today's telcon are not yet out even in draft  
> form,
> but I expect they'd be a good place to get more details of where we  
> stand
> for the moment.
>
> Thank you again for your prompt response.
>
> Noah
>
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2005Jan/0000.html
> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2005Oct/0001.html
> [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2005Oct/0049.html
>
> --------------------------------------
> Noah Mendelsohn
> IBM Corporation
> One Rogers Street
> Cambridge, MA 02142
> 1-617-693-4036
> --------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>


--
Mark Nottingham   Principal Technologist
Office of the CTO   BEA Systems
Received on Thursday, 27 October 2005 18:49:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:56:09 UTC