- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 00:03:58 -0500
- To: www-tag@w3.org
Hello TAG, I attempted to raise[1] an issue with the WS Addressing WG recently, regarding what I felt to be a serious architectural flaw with the WS-Addressing SOAP binding[2]. In a nutshell, it requires that the URI in the "Address" component of a WS-Addressing EPR be serialized into a wsa:To SOAP header, independent of the underlying protocol. IMO, a Web-architecture consistent means of doing this would be to serialize it to the Request-URI when using SOAP with HTTP, or the "RCPT TO:" value when using SOAP with SMTP, etc... Unfortunately, the WG disagreed with me that this was a problem, and declined[3] to accept it as an issue. I believe the reasoning that was given for the issue being declined was flawed. It claimed that additional bindings could be defined, which is true, but does nothing to address the issue with the SOAP binding and its suitability for use with application protocols (indeed, one possible resolution would be to claim that it should only be used with transport protocols). But it's clear to me that the status quo with the SOAP binding is inconsistent with the architecture of the Web (and the Internet too), so I respectfully request that the TAG consider this as a new issue. Thanks! And Happy New Year to all. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-addressing/2004Dec/0119.html [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-ws-addr-soap-20041208/ [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-addressing/2005Jan/0001.html Mark. -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca
Received on Monday, 3 January 2005 05:04:11 UTC