- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 11:51:48 -0600
- To: Vincent.Quint@inrialpes.fr
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 15:41 +0100, Vincent Quint wrote: > http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2005/12/13-agenda.html [...] > 1. Administrative > Roll call -- Regrets: ? > Chair: Vincent, Scribe: Dan > Propose next teleconference: 20 December > Accept this agenda? > Minutes of MIT f2f > > 2. Escaping the # mark in XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Functions and > Operators > See XML Query + XSL WG request[10] > See section 7.4.10[11], 7.4.11[12] of draft XQuery 1.0 and XPath > 2.0 Functions and Operators (CR)[13] > > 3. issue NamespaceState-48[14] > Last discussion[15] was in Edinburgh in September. According to > this discussion, The Disposition of Names in an XML Namespace[16] > should be an approved finding. Is norm's updated finding in time to get namespaceDocument-8 on today's agenda, perhaps as #4? http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/nsDocuments/ 13 December 2005 It seems relevant to #33 among our pending actions http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2005/03/action-summary.html 33. NDW: follow-up on namespaceDocument-8, based on DanC's vanilla XHTML example [30 Aug 05] And if we do put the issue on today's agenda, let's review the other relevant actions. These seem to be done or obsolete: 8. NDW to follow up on noah's message on ns name [12 jul 05] 32. DanC: draft a section on using XHTML 1.x (not RDDL) with GRDDL and relax-ng [30 Aug 05] (progress 7 Oct And I'm reminded that this is still outstanding: 23. DanC to ask for "default nature" to be changed to "implicit nature" in RDDL spec [22 Sep 05] (re namespaceDocument-8) Maybe I'll make progres... no, not in 10 minutes... I wonder to what extent this action is relevant... TBL to provide a draft of new namespace policy doc (http://www.w3.org/1999/10/nsuri) and start discussion on www-tag [8 Mar 05] -- in progress 30 Aug The issues list shows a bunch of really old actions. http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html?type=1#namespaceDocument-8 I wonder if it's really worth trying to keep the actions up-to-date in the issues list. > 4. Update on some issues > Not much progress was made on the following issues recently. The > goal is to review them quickly and decide about their priority. > > * 1. Issue IRIEverywhere-27[17]: long discussion[18] in > Edinburgh > * 2. Issue metadataInURI-31[19]: short discussion[20] in > Edinburgh > * 3. Issue RDFinXHTML-35[21]: last discussion[22] in February > 2005 > * 4. Issue siteData-36[23]: short discussion[24] in February > 2005 > * 5. Issue rdfURIMeaning-39[25]: short discussion[26] in > Edinburgh > * 6. Issue URIGoodPractice-40[27]: last discussion[28] in > February 2005 > * 7. Issue DerivedResources-43[29]: last discussion[30] in > Edinburgh > * 8. Issue mediaTypeManagement-45[31]: last update[32] in > October 2005 > * 9. Issue xml11Names-46[33]: last update[34] in October 2005 > * 10. Issue standardizedFieldValues-51[35]: no progress since > the announcement of the issue > > 5. Any other issue? -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 13 December 2005 17:52:03 UTC