W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > December 2005

Re: Agenda of 13 December 2005 TAG teleconference

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 11:51:48 -0600
To: Vincent.Quint@inrialpes.fr
Cc: www-tag@w3.org
Message-Id: <1134496308.2319.435.camel@dirk>

On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 15:41 +0100, Vincent Quint wrote:
>     http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2005/12/13-agenda.html
[...]
>        1. Administrative
>           Roll call -- Regrets: ?
>           Chair: Vincent, Scribe: Dan
>           Propose next teleconference: 20 December
>           Accept this agenda?
>           Minutes of MIT f2f
> 
>        2. Escaping the # mark in XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Functions and
>           Operators
>           See XML Query + XSL WG request[10]
>           See section 7.4.10[11], 7.4.11[12] of draft XQuery 1.0 and XPath
>           2.0 Functions and Operators (CR)[13]
> 
>        3. issue NamespaceState-48[14]
>           Last discussion[15] was in Edinburgh in September. According to
>           this discussion, The Disposition of Names in an XML Namespace[16]
>           should be an approved finding.

Is norm's updated finding in time to get namespaceDocument-8 on today's
agenda, perhaps as #4?

http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/nsDocuments/
13 December 2005

It seems relevant to #33 among our pending actions
http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2005/03/action-summary.html

33. NDW: follow-up on namespaceDocument-8, based on DanC's vanilla XHTML
example [30 Aug 05]


And if we do put the issue on today's agenda, let's review the other
relevant actions. These seem to be done or obsolete:

8. NDW to follow up on noah's message on ns name [12 jul 05]
32. DanC: draft a section on using XHTML 1.x (not RDDL) with GRDDL and
relax-ng [30 Aug 05] (progress 7 Oct


And I'm reminded that this is still outstanding:

23. DanC to ask for "default nature" to be changed to "implicit nature"
in RDDL spec [22 Sep 05] (re namespaceDocument-8)

Maybe I'll make progres... no, not in 10 minutes...


I wonder to what extent this action is relevant...

TBL to provide a draft of new namespace policy doc
(http://www.w3.org/1999/10/nsuri) and start discussion on www-tag [8 Mar
05] -- in progress 30 Aug


The issues list shows a bunch of really old actions.
http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html?type=1#namespaceDocument-8

I wonder if it's really worth trying to keep the actions up-to-date
in the issues list.






>        4. Update on some issues
>           Not much progress was made on the following issues recently. The
>           goal is to review them quickly and decide about their priority.
> 
>              *  1. Issue IRIEverywhere-27[17]: long discussion[18] in
>                 Edinburgh
>              *  2. Issue metadataInURI-31[19]: short discussion[20] in
>                 Edinburgh
>              *  3. Issue RDFinXHTML-35[21]: last discussion[22] in February
>                 2005
>              *  4. Issue siteData-36[23]: short discussion[24] in February
>                 2005
>              *  5. Issue rdfURIMeaning-39[25]: short discussion[26] in
>                 Edinburgh
>              *  6. Issue URIGoodPractice-40[27]: last discussion[28] in
>                 February 2005
>              *  7. Issue DerivedResources-43[29]: last discussion[30] in
>                 Edinburgh
>              *  8. Issue mediaTypeManagement-45[31]: last update[32] in
>                 October 2005
>              *  9. Issue xml11Names-46[33]: last update[34] in October 2005
>              *  10. Issue standardizedFieldValues-51[35]: no progress since
>                 the announcement of the issue
> 
>        5. Any other issue?

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 13 December 2005 17:52:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:56:10 UTC