agendas, actions, and issues [was: Agenda of 13 Dec...]

On Tue, 2005-12-13 at 11:51 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote:
> It seems relevant to #33 among our pending actions

In writing up yesterday's minutes, I went looking for an action
item, and ended up sorting the pending actions by issue.
  Updated $Date: 2005/12/14 15:02:32 $ by $Author: connolly $

I left the existing numbered list in tact, except that I moved
some to the Done pile.

> The issues list shows a bunch of really old actions.
> I wonder if it's really worth trying to keep the actions up-to-date
> in the issues list.

I now think it's a good idea to do that. That is: when we look
at one action, we should also look at the other actions related
to the same issue. And the relevant findings and such should be
handy too. So we might as well keep it all in the issues list.

But I'm more inclined to use an XHTML microformat and GRDDL
and RDF than exit . Hmm...

Dan Connolly, W3C
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

Received on Wednesday, 14 December 2005 15:15:36 UTC