W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > July 2008

Re: Applying SVG properties to non-SVG content

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 14:32:02 +1200
Message-ID: <11e306600807131932y763d76f5x642ff7eaed4aba2f@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Robin Berjon" <robin@berjon.com>
Cc: www-style@w3.org, www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com> wrote:

> On Jul 12, 2008, at 00:04 , Robert O'Callahan wrote:
>> As per SVG, SVG paint servers are not affected by effects on ancestors.
> And that's fine. I worry about the following though:
>  If you're talking about the element-as-background extension, I haven't
>> written down a proposed spec for that yet. But when I do, it will also
>> ignore clip, opacity and other effects on the ancestors of referenced
>> elements. Is that surprising? I can't think why you'd want it any other way.
> I can't say that I have a strong opinion on this, but I believe it clashes
> with this: http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGMobile12/linking.html#LinksIntoSVG

Yes it would. Another blow in favour of element().

"He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities;
the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are
healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to his
own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all." [Isaiah
Received on Monday, 14 July 2008 02:32:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:54:19 UTC