- From: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 23:46:55 +0200
- To: robert@ocallahan.org
- Cc: www-style@w3.org, www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
On Jul 12, 2008, at 00:04 , Robert O'Callahan wrote: > As per SVG, SVG paint servers are not affected by effects on > ancestors. And that's fine. I worry about the following though: > If you're talking about the element-as-background extension, I > haven't written down a proposed spec for that yet. But when I do, it > will also ignore clip, opacity and other effects on the ancestors of > referenced elements. Is that surprising? I can't think why you'd > want it any other way. I can't say that I have a strong opinion on this, but I believe it clashes with this: http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGMobile12/linking.html#LinksIntoSVG -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/
Received on Saturday, 12 July 2008 21:47:32 UTC