Sent from my iPhone On Sep 27, 2016, at 12:11 AM, Sebastian Zartner <sebastianzartner@gmail.com<mailto:sebastianzartner@gmail.com>> wrote: On 26 September 2016 at 20:01, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net<mailto:fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>> wrote: On 05/02/2016 07:20 PM, Sebastian Zartner wrote: fantasai wrote: On 12/13/2015 11:39 PM, Sebastian Zartner wrote: > Both values are relatively long and one is a noun while the other is > an adjective, which makes them inconsistent. > > Therefore I believe they should be renamed. The words I have in mind > are 'near' and 'always'. Though maybe somebody else can come up with > better words. Just came up with an idea: borrowing from the 'line-break' property, how about 'strict' and 'loose'? Sounds good to me. To follow up on this, the WG rejected these terms at this telecon: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016May/0044.html and since there were no other proposals that seemed to gain traction, the keywords have not been renamed. If anyone has any regrets, or a better proposal, speak now or forever hold your peace, because we're going to CR asap. :p My initially proposed keywords 'near' and 'always' were unfortunately not discussed in that meeting. At least Alan liked them[1]. Sebastian [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0186.html Those terms were discussed (they just didn't make it to the summary)
Received on Tuesday, 27 September 2016 07:58:44 UTC