- From: Sebastian Zartner <sebastianzartner@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 00:07:13 +0200
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 26 September 2016 22:08:02 UTC
On 26 September 2016 at 20:01, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > On 05/02/2016 07:20 PM, Sebastian Zartner wrote: > >> fantasai wrote: >> >>> On 12/13/2015 11:39 PM, Sebastian Zartner wrote: >>> >>> > Both values are relatively long and one is a noun while the other is >>> > an adjective, which makes them inconsistent. >>> > >>> > Therefore I believe they should be renamed. The words I have in mind >>> > are 'near' and 'always'. Though maybe somebody else can come up with >>> > better words. >>> >>> >>> Just came up with an idea: borrowing from the 'line-break' property, >>> how about 'strict' and 'loose'? >>> >> >> Sounds good to me. >> > > To follow up on this, the WG rejected these terms at this telecon: > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016May/0044.html > and since there were no other proposals that seemed to gain traction, > the keywords have not been renamed. > > If anyone has any regrets, or a better proposal, speak now or forever > hold your peace, because we're going to CR asap. :p My initially proposed keywords 'near' and 'always' were unfortunately not discussed in that meeting. At least Alan liked them[1]. Sebastian [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0186.html
Received on Monday, 26 September 2016 22:08:02 UTC