W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 2016

Re: [css-scroll-snap] Rename keywords 'proximity' and 'mandatory'

From: Sebastian Zartner <sebastianzartner@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 00:07:13 +0200
Message-ID: <CAERejNaYdFhkqgi-9nEQC1BpihdGYRUmx80-D2X1-Ruz9=whcw@mail.gmail.com>
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On 26 September 2016 at 20:01, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
wrote:

> On 05/02/2016 07:20 PM, Sebastian Zartner wrote:
>
>> fantasai wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/13/2015 11:39 PM, Sebastian Zartner wrote:
>>>
>>> > Both values are relatively long and one is a noun while the other is
>>> > an adjective, which makes them inconsistent.
>>> >
>>> > Therefore I believe they should be renamed. The words I have in mind
>>> > are 'near' and 'always'. Though maybe somebody else can come up with
>>> > better words.
>>>
>>>
>>> Just came up with an idea: borrowing from the 'line-break' property,
>>> how about 'strict' and 'loose'?
>>>
>>
>> Sounds good to me.
>>
>
> To follow up on this, the WG rejected these terms at this telecon:
>   https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016May/0044.html
> and since there were no other proposals that seemed to gain traction,
> the keywords have not been renamed.
>
> If anyone has any regrets, or a better proposal, speak now or forever
> hold your peace, because we're going to CR asap. :p


My initially proposed keywords 'near' and 'always' were unfortunately not
discussed in that meeting. At least Alan liked them[1].

Sebastian

[1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0186.html
Received on Monday, 26 September 2016 22:08:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:09:04 UTC