- From: Sebastian Zartner <sebastianzartner@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 14:09:50 +0200
- To: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
- Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAERejNaQLejtk+1p=4ADqawndFb6t_DAicCHBr+QMLx5HJJDhg@mail.gmail.com>
On 27 September 2016 at 09:58, Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com> wrote: > > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Sep 27, 2016, at 12:11 AM, Sebastian Zartner < > sebastianzartner@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 26 September 2016 at 20:01, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> > wrote: > >> On 05/02/2016 07:20 PM, Sebastian Zartner wrote: >> >>> fantasai wrote: >>> >>>> On 12/13/2015 11:39 PM, Sebastian Zartner wrote: >>>> >>>> > Both values are relatively long and one is a noun while the other is >>>> > an adjective, which makes them inconsistent. >>>> > >>>> > Therefore I believe they should be renamed. The words I have in mind >>>> > are 'near' and 'always'. Though maybe somebody else can come up with >>>> > better words. >>>> >>>> >>>> Just came up with an idea: borrowing from the 'line-break' property, >>>> how about 'strict' and 'loose'? >>>> >>> >>> Sounds good to me. >>> >> >> To follow up on this, the WG rejected these terms at this telecon: >> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016May/0044.html >> and since there were no other proposals that seemed to gain traction, >> the keywords have not been renamed. >> >> If anyone has any regrets, or a better proposal, speak now or forever >> hold your peace, because we're going to CR asap. :p > > > My initially proposed keywords 'near' and 'always' were unfortunately not > discussed in that meeting. At least Alan liked them[1]. > > Sebastian > > [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0186.html > > > Those terms were discussed (they just didn't make it to the summary) > Wasn't there a poll for this at some point? I don't remember it clearly. If not, I think it would be worth to do one. I don't want to hold up CR, but 'proximity' and 'mandatory' are definitely not the best keywords. Sebastian
Received on Tuesday, 27 September 2016 12:10:40 UTC