- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 16:30:05 +0100
- To: www-style@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 31 May 2016 15:30:17 UTC
Let me amplify and restate these points: On 2016-05-31 06:57, Andrew Cunningham wrote: > It would be fairly quick and easy for google to add support for > font-language-override Supporting font-language override would not only increase spec compliance, it would be the path of least effort > > It would take years for google to map orthographic usage of sufficient > number oflanguages to add additional locl support to noto for instance > to make lang attribute usable. Depending on complex mappings from @lang to OpenType lang is a lot of work, currently being done for you by font designers. This is a duplication of effort and a maintenance burden; just support font-language-override. It is there for a reason. -- Chris Lilley @svgeesus Technical Director, W3C Interaction Domain
Received on Tuesday, 31 May 2016 15:30:17 UTC