- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 15:10:25 -0700
- To: Mats Palmgren <mats@mozilla.com>, www-style@w3.org
On 05/16/2016 09:19 AM, Mats Palmgren wrote: > > As I read it, "sized by a minmax() function" doesn't apply for > minmax(1fr,...) because the value is simply invalid. The track > is sized by the (computed) value 'auto' in this case. > > I agree that the text could be clearer though. Perhaps replace > "If the track was sized with a minmax() function" with > "If the computed value of the track sizing function is a minmax() > function" ? > > "track sizing function" is a defined term in [1] and it excludes > 'fr' in the min value in a minmax(). So it should be clear that > the computed value is 'auto' in that case. > (linking "track sizing function" from [4] to [1] would help too) I'm a little confused what you mean by computing to 'auto'. Invalid syntax causes the declaration to be thrown out, not for it to compute to 'auto'... ~fantasai
Received on Monday, 16 May 2016 22:10:53 UTC