Re: [css3-images] A value for image-rendering to request high-quality rendering

> On Jan 27, 2016, at 12:25 pm, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> wrote:
> 
> Hello Simon,
> 
> Wednesday, January 27, 2016, 10:04:12 PM, you wrote:
> 
>> We currently use "image-rendering:
>> optimizeQuality" as a signal to avoid this quality reduction.
>> However, the spec now says that optimizeQuality should be treated
>> like ‘auto’, so if I follow the spec, we lose this useful value.
> 
> Can we just change the spec to say that optimizeQuality means, well,
> optimizeQuality? is there some web-compat reason to make this value
> useless? Because the name is actually simple and clear.

I think we want “optimizeQuality” to go away because it has the weird SVG intercaps.
But maybe we could keep it as “optimize-quality”.

Simon