- From: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 12:48:19 -0800
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
> On Jan 27, 2016, at 12:25 pm, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> wrote: > > Hello Simon, > > Wednesday, January 27, 2016, 10:04:12 PM, you wrote: > >> We currently use "image-rendering: >> optimizeQuality" as a signal to avoid this quality reduction. >> However, the spec now says that optimizeQuality should be treated >> like ‘auto’, so if I follow the spec, we lose this useful value. > > Can we just change the spec to say that optimizeQuality means, well, > optimizeQuality? is there some web-compat reason to make this value > useless? Because the name is actually simple and clear. I think we want “optimizeQuality” to go away because it has the weird SVG intercaps. But maybe we could keep it as “optimize-quality”. Simon
Received on Wednesday, 27 January 2016 20:48:51 UTC