- From: Christian Biesinger <cbiesinger@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 15:47:59 -0500
- To: Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, Manuel Rego Casasnovas <rego@igalia.com>
Actually, the -007 versions of both of these have the same problem.
-Christian
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Christian Biesinger
<cbiesinger@google.com> wrote:
> The flexbox testcases are flex-minimum-{height,width}-flex-items-005.xht
>
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css-flexbox-1_dev/nightly-unstable/xhtml1/flex-minimum-height-flex-items-005.xht
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css-flexbox-1_dev/nightly-unstable/xhtml1/flex-minimum-width-flex-items-005.xht
>
> -Christian
>
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com> wrote:
>> On 01/27/2016 12:10 PM, Christian Biesinger wrote:
>>> OK, thanks. I'll fix Blink to consistently use 60px here.
>>>
>>> -Christian
>>
>> Sounds good.
>>
>> (You mentioned flexbox testcases, too -- I assume any testcases that
>> think the image should be 100px in this scenario wide must've been
>> written based on the older spec-text.)
Received on Wednesday, 27 January 2016 20:48:47 UTC