- From: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
- Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 09:59:51 +0100
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
> On Feb 29, 2016, at 00:22, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > > On 02/26/2016 05:54 AM, Florian Rivoal wrote: >> >>> Okay. I think we should prioritize the block overflow aspect, then, >>> and give it an easy-to-use name. :) >> >> If you've got a better pair of names to suggest, I'm all ears. > > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Feb/0043.html That mail only suggests a better name for half the pair. Are you suggesting we keep overflow-inline as it is? I'm not sure that's great, since it makes overflow / overflow-inline look like a short-hand / long-hand pair, which they are not. - Florian
Received on Monday, 29 February 2016 09:00:18 UTC