- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 10:25:11 -0800
- To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
While I'm sympathetic to the differences between block and inline overflow, and it may indeed be necessary sometimes to query them independently, I think it's probably easier for authors if we provide a simple 'overflow' query: overflow: none | scroll | scroll-page | page where the author assumption is that if it's 'page', then there's no inline scrolling, although the UA may allow it. Also, I suggest the following renamings: paged -> page for grammatic consistency with scroll optional-paged -> scroll-page because it does both, it's not just paging ~fantasai
Received on Saturday, 6 February 2016 01:38:34 UTC