W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2016

[mediaqueries] overflow-block/inline

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 10:25:11 -0800
To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <56B4E907.5060604@inkedblade.net>
While I'm sympathetic to the differences between block and inline overflow,
and it may indeed be necessary sometimes to query them independently,
I think it's probably easier for authors if we provide a simple 'overflow'

overflow: none | scroll | scroll-page | page

where the author assumption is that if it's 'page', then there's no
inline scrolling, although the UA may allow it.

Also, I suggest the following renamings:
  paged -> page for grammatic consistency with scroll
  optional-paged -> scroll-page because it does both, it's not just paging

Received on Saturday, 6 February 2016 01:38:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:09:00 UTC