- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 18:42:20 -0500
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 02/26/2016 02:04 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 8:46 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: >> On 02/09/2016 08:17 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >>> What problem do you have with light-level? Aside from the "should we >>> also map a11y concerns to this", I think the feature itself is 100% >>> stable and well-designed. >> >> That's exactly my concern. :) >> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Feb/0295.html > > That's not a problem with light-level in any way. At most, it's a > question of "should we do this future MQ, or just recommend using > 'light-level' for that purpose". a11y concerns won't change our > design of 'light-level' at all - it does exactly what it's supposed > to. I agree that the design of 'light-level' shouldn't change. I don't expect it to. I do expect that whether it should be masquerading as an a11y MQ is likely to change based on further thought on those. Imho, light-level and contrast and bg/fg preferences are three different things. light-level handling will often be ONE OF a) contrast changes b) bg/fg inversion c) both a) and b) and which one of these three options the author takes is IMHO not something we or the OS should be assuming. E.g. I think it's perfectly reasonable to have a light-on-dark high contrast design for dim lighting. Telling UAs that triggering 'light-level: dim' for low-contrast users is not going to serve them well on my website. I can live with light-level shipping as-is if we remove the a11y-related suggestions, if you feel this is critical. However, I would *prefer* if we delayed it to L5 so that we can release 'light-level', 'preferred-contrast', and 'preferred-fgbg' *together*. This lets us set up authoring best practices (through spec recommendations and examples, and hopefully any tutorials based on them) to encourage anyone handling light-level to also opt in for the relevant a11y queries. ~fantasai
Received on Sunday, 28 February 2016 23:42:49 UTC