- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 11:04:30 -0800
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 8:46 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > On 02/09/2016 08:17 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> What problem do you have with light-level? Aside from the "should we >> also map a11y concerns to this", I think the feature itself is 100% >> stable and well-designed. > > That's exactly my concern. :) > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Feb/0295.html That's not a problem with light-level in any way. At most, it's a question of "should we do this future MQ, or just recommend using 'light-level' for that purpose". a11y concerns won't change our design of 'light-level' at all - it does exactly what it's supposed to. ~TJ
Received on Friday, 26 February 2016 19:05:17 UTC