W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2016

Re: [mediaqueries] status and moving forward

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 11:04:30 -0800
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDAgSi-WkTwxe2wNnb+nH_POgsV8kg0T4oa7Rx33SzpRHw@mail.gmail.com>
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 8:46 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:
> On 02/09/2016 08:17 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>> What problem do you have with light-level?  Aside from the "should we
>> also map a11y concerns to this", I think the feature itself is 100%
>> stable and well-designed.
> That's exactly my concern. :)
>   https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Feb/0295.html

That's not a problem with light-level in any way.  At most, it's a
question of "should we do this future MQ, or just recommend using
'light-level' for that purpose".  a11y concerns won't change our
design of 'light-level' at all - it does exactly what it's supposed

Received on Friday, 26 February 2016 19:05:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:09:00 UTC