- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 11:52:04 -0700
- To: Christian Biesinger <cbiesinger@google.com>
- Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, Greg Whitworth <gwhit@microsoft.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 4:26 PM, Christian Biesinger <cbiesinger@google.com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 4:03 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: >> On 04/22/2016 12:56 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 2:39 PM, Christian Biesinger >>> <cbiesinger@google.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> For align, it's only align-items/align-self, but not align-content. >>>> Tested in Edge 20.10240.16384.0 >>>> >>>> For justify it is justify-content as you say. >>> >>> >>> Ah, right, align-content happens to not have an effect, because the >>> abspos is treated as being the only flex item, so the flexbox is >>> single-line for these purposes, and the flex line is stretched to the >>> size of the flexbox (so there's no free space to align the flex line >>> with). >> >> >> Whether a flex container is single-line or multi-line depends >> on its flex-wrap property, not on how many items there are. > > Hm, so, am I understanding you right that the desired effect is the > following (again, for abspos children of flex containers): > > - If flex-wrap: nowrap: > Align items per align-items, ignore align-content > - If flex-wrap: wrap or wrap-reverse: > Ignore align-items (because the size of the line is the size of the > flex item), align per align-content. > Unless align-content is stretch and cross-size is definite, then use > align-items. > > Right...? The right behavior per spec is to just do *precisely* what a lone flex item would do. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 26 April 2016 18:53:26 UTC