- From: Amelia Bellamy-Royds <amelia.bellamy.royds@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 10:32:55 +0100
- To: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAFDDJ7xet6c+b633At=jn37xO9jXX68TvTXJtVtmuMAnvb0Zgg@mail.gmail.com>
Interesting, idea. Would be fun to generalize a :for(selector) pseudo-class for styling form element labels. Eg label:for(:required) But doesn't address the too-common case where the image icon that failed to load is a CSS background image or generated content image. On 21 April 2016 at 10:03, Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net> wrote: > > > On Apr 21, 2016, at 15:31, Amelia Bellamy-Royds < > amelia.bellamy.royds@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > For this kind of use cases, especially the first one, I think a pseudo > class that matches on images that fail to load would be easier to use than > a media query. > > > > An element pseudoclass does have the benefit of applying to broken links > as well as no-image settings. Mozilla already has a prefixed pseudoclass > for this case. However, it puts constraints on which *other* elements you > can effect with the selector (needs to be a direct sibling after the > missing image in the DOM tree). This limits the use for doing things like > un-hiding text labels and captions. Still better than nothing, of course. > > Right. Maybe we could make something along these lines to work, and it > would solve the problem: > > <style> > label[for] { display: none; } > image:failed-to-load { display: none; } > label:for(image:failed-to-load) { display: block; } > </style> > <label for="foo">This is my nice image</label> > <img src="....." alt="...." id="foo"> > >
Received on Thursday, 21 April 2016 09:33:23 UTC