- From: Manuel Rego Casasnovas <rego@igalia.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 11:26:12 +0200
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 21/04/16 09:44, Manuel Rego Casasnovas wrote: >> Testcase: >> http://software.hixie.ch/utilities/js/live-dom-viewer/?saved=4087 > > BTW, the item in the 3rd case "Grid (50% track size)" would have 100px > width because it has "min-width: auto;". The track would be 50px. > So, unless you specify "min-width: 0px;", the behavior would be > different than the one for blocks. And one more thing, the grid container would be 100px and the only track in that container would be 50px. I'm not sure if that would be the expected behavior when in the section about intrinsic sizes of a grid we've: "The max-content size of a grid container is the sum of the grid container’s track sizes in the appropriate axis, when the grid is sized under a max-content constraint. The min-content size of a grid container is the sum of the grid container’s track sizes in the appropriate axis, when the grid is sized under a min-content constraint." Again I'm not sure if this would work (or not) the same for a positioned/floated grid container than for a grid container with "width: min-content;". E.g. <div style="position: absolute; font: 25px/1 Ahem;"> <div style="width: 50%;">XXXX</div> </div> vs <div style="width: min-content; font: 25px/1 Ahem;"> <div style="width: 50%;">XXXX</div> </div> Bye, Rego [1] https://drafts.csswg.org/css-grid/#intrinsic-sizes
Received on Thursday, 21 April 2016 09:26:47 UTC