W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2016

Re: [css-grid] Reduced Subgrid Proposal

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 11:40:44 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDBTTNEPrB7NYZr6m4GrZ7ou016ByNHy1ugUmjfuQu4XHQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Eric A. Meyer" <eric@meyerweb.com>
Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Eric A. Meyer <eric@meyerweb.com> wrote:
> On 20 Apr 2016, at 14:21, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Eric A. Meyer <eric@meyerweb.com> wrote:
>>> This makes general sense to me.  By "explicit grid span", do you mean
>>> "must
>>> provide start and end lines" or is it sufficient to provide start lines
>>> and
>>> assume "span 1" for the end lines?
>> We have to be able to tell what its span is; whether you do that by
>> providing explicit start/end lines, or an explicit span, or just rely
>> on the default "span 1" behavior, doesn't matter to us.
> Oh right, so no 'auto'.  What's the defined behavior if someone tries to
> supply 'auto' for a start and/or end line?  Treat the result as if it were
> the explicitly-declared equivalent, refuse to subgrid, or something else?

No, "auto" is fine - "auto" just means that property doesn't add
anything to the placement.  The point is just that the subgrid doesn't
have an implicit grid. ^_^

Received on Wednesday, 20 April 2016 18:41:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:09:02 UTC