- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 11:40:44 -0700
- To: "Eric A. Meyer" <eric@meyerweb.com>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Eric A. Meyer <eric@meyerweb.com> wrote: > On 20 Apr 2016, at 14:21, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Eric A. Meyer <eric@meyerweb.com> wrote: >> >>> This makes general sense to me. By "explicit grid span", do you mean >>> "must >>> provide start and end lines" or is it sufficient to provide start lines >>> and >>> assume "span 1" for the end lines? >> >> We have to be able to tell what its span is; whether you do that by >> providing explicit start/end lines, or an explicit span, or just rely >> on the default "span 1" behavior, doesn't matter to us. > > Oh right, so no 'auto'. What's the defined behavior if someone tries to > supply 'auto' for a start and/or end line? Treat the result as if it were > the explicitly-declared equivalent, refuse to subgrid, or something else? No, "auto" is fine - "auto" just means that property doesn't add anything to the placement. The point is just that the subgrid doesn't have an implicit grid. ^_^ ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 20 April 2016 18:41:32 UTC