W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2016

Re: [css-transitions] Normalization of steps()

From: Brian Birtles <bbirtles@mozilla.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 16:00:40 +0900
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Shane Stephens <shans@google.com>, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <57109198.7060304@mozilla.com>
On 2016/04/08 1:37, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> The standard serialization strategy is to serialize with the minimum
> amount necessary to accurately represent the value. If omitting some
> component is the same as specifying a particular keyword, then all
> values with that keyword serialize with it omitted, etc.

Another follow up here, how does this principle apply to 'steps(1)' vs 
'step-end'. Currently we have:

  Chrome:  'steps(1)' -> 'step-end'
  Firefox: 'steps(1)' -> 'steps(1)'
  Edge:    'steps(1)' -> 'steps(1, end)'

Also, it would be good to know if this is defined in CSSOM or somewhere 
else.

Thanks,

Brian
Received on Friday, 15 April 2016 07:01:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:09:02 UTC