Re: [css-transitions] Normalization of steps()

On 2016/04/08 1:37, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> The standard serialization strategy is to serialize with the minimum
> amount necessary to accurately represent the value. If omitting some
> component is the same as specifying a particular keyword, then all
> values with that keyword serialize with it omitted, etc.

Another follow up here, how does this principle apply to 'steps(1)' vs 
'step-end'. Currently we have:

  Chrome:  'steps(1)' -> 'step-end'
  Firefox: 'steps(1)' -> 'steps(1)'
  Edge:    'steps(1)' -> 'steps(1, end)'

Also, it would be good to know if this is defined in CSSOM or somewhere 
else.

Thanks,

Brian