- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 16:46:12 -0700
- To: Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 11:00 PM, Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com> wrote: >> In a recent email, Tab mentioned that calc() should be nestable, and >> should just be identical to parentheses. >> >> I'd like to propose that, when serializing nested calc(), flattening >> it to parentheses as well, instead of keeping the original redundant >> function name. >> >> It seems in both the spec and the impls, we already have some kind of >> simplifying process, thus I think flattening nested calc() to >> parentheses seems reasonable. It would likely also make implementation >> simpler. > > I agree with this. Following up, we resolved to accept this proposal on a telcon. ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 13 April 2016 23:46:59 UTC