On 04/12/2016 01:53 PM, Eric A. Meyer wrote: > On 11 Apr 2016, at 19:55, fantasai wrote: > >> I think what you're expecting totally makes sense, but also >> fixing it would mean adding additional steps to the track >> sizing algorithm, which I'm a little hesitant to do right >> now... >> >> But something that's imho definitely worth investigating, >> so perhaps it would make sense to make this syntax invalid >> for the moment, so that we can figure out what to do with >> it in Level 2. > > How are you thinking of invalidating? Forbid 'fr' units > from being used in the 'min' position, or ban then from minmax() > expressions altogether, or something else entirely? Making them invalid in the min position. ~fantasaiReceived on Tuesday, 12 April 2016 19:24:13 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:09:02 UTC