W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2016

Re: Towards a better testsuite: Attributions

From: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 10:04:01 +0900
Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
Message-Id: <C838725D-54C3-471F-A584-53887915DAFE@rivoal.net>
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>

> On Apr 9, 2016, at 02:00, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:
> 
> On 03/24/2016 01:00 PM, Geoffrey Sneddon wrote:
>> 
>> I went through all of the all of the metadata in
>> <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-css-testsuite/2015Oct/0004.html>;
>> there's rough agreement on removing much of what we currently have.
>> That said, I think it's worthwhile to reiterate that requiring *any*
>> metadata causes friction. Tests written by browser vendors are rarely
>> a file or two which is quick to add metadata too. I know in general
>> people seem interested in using the same infrastructure to run both
>> web-platform-tests and csswg-test, which essentially requires the
>> metadata required to run the tests be identical across the two.
> 
> Wrt authoring information... It would be convenient not to
> have to include these in the test files. However, in most
> projects his information is in the checkin logs, and we
> don't really have those for tests that are shared across
> repositories like this.

I don't know about mercurial (and other VCS that might be in use), but at least
as far as git is concerned, author and committer information are tracked separately,
and preserving author information should be doable even when migrating TCs across repos, even if the committer information is lost/replaced by that of the sync script.

> I don't have a good answer, but I think we should have one.
> Simplest case, we can keep <link rel="author">, but make it
> optional.

Regardless of the VCS capabilities, we should do that. It costs nothing to the people who don't care and gives a chance to the people who do to make sure this information is captured.

 - Florian
Received on Monday, 11 April 2016 01:04:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:09:02 UTC