W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2016

Re: [css-flexbox] inconsistent wording for definite sizing

From: Christian Biesinger <cbiesinger@google.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 16:39:06 -0400
Message-ID: <CAPTJ0XEznduwqPWxA=-58q9DZMwk31QLiwbdmEL2dAr69ihWWg@mail.gmail.com>
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Thank you, it does!

Thanks,
-Christian

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 4:36 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:
> On 03/08/2016 03:13 PM, Christian Biesinger wrote:
>>
>> Hi there!
>>
>> The flexbox spec has inconsistent requirements for definite sizing.
>> Compare:
>> https://www.w3.org/TR/css3-flexbox/#algo-stretch
>> vs
>> https://www.w3.org/TR/css3-flexbox/#definite-sizes
>>
>> The former indicates no requirement that the flexbox itself
>> is single-line, doesn't wrap, etc. My interpretation is that I
>> should follow the second one only. Is that correct?
>
>
> We clarified that step 11 creates an additional case of definiteness
> by adding another bullet to section 9.8:
>   https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/88ade2efb4e8
>
> Let us know if this resolves the issue!
>
> ~fantasai
Received on Monday, 4 April 2016 20:39:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:09:02 UTC