- From: Robert Hogan <robhogan@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 18:15:38 +0000
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 20 October 2015 18:16:20 UTC
Forgot to cc the list. On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 7:41 PM Robert Hogan <robhogan@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 7:16 PM L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote: > >> On Monday 2015-10-19 18:10 +0000, Robert Hogan wrote: >> > HI all, >> > >> > Could I get some direction on this? Is the exclusion of tables from >> > overflow-x and overflow-y by confining them to block-containers >> deliberate? >> >> Not sure what the original intention was, but I wasn't aware of any >> implementations applying them to tables. Do they? >> > > Thanks for getting back to me! Yes - the actual bug that led me here is: > https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=544074 > > There the example given has a body element is styled as a table: > https://jsfiddle.net/4ddutgaf/ > > FF applies the overflow-x of hidden, Blink does not. (If either of > overflow-x or overflow-y are visible, Blink computes both to visible.) > > >
Received on Tuesday, 20 October 2015 18:16:20 UTC