- From: Gérard Talbot <www-style@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 21:10:15 -0400
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: 馬場孝夫 <baba@bpsinc.jp>, Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>, Jonathan Kew <jfkthame@gmail.com>, Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com>, W3C www-style mailing list <www-style@w3.org>
Le 2015-09-30 18:44, fantasai a écrit : > On 09/19/2015 08:17 PM, 馬場孝夫 wrote: >> Sorry for late response, and thank you for clear explanation. >> >>> I am not strongly opposed either way. However, I think than >>> symmetry between sideways-left and sideways-right is overstated. >>> sideways right just affects glyph orientation, while sideways-left >>> also affects the baseline orientation and line progression direction. >>> >>> So I have a preference for something like sideways and >>> sideways-reverse >>> over -left and -right. >> >> I've understood Florian's point, your opinion makes sense. >> >> >>> Option A: it prints "sideways" and "sideways-right" >>> Option B: it prints "sideways" and "sideways" >>> Option C: it prints "sideways-right" and "sideways-right" >> >> So now I think both B and C are fine if there is no compatibility >> problems. > > To close on this, the CSSWG resolved on B. This has now been > edited into the ED. > > ~fantasai I have not followed this thread... We have now 1 test on computed value of 'text-orientation: sideways-right'. http://test.csswg.org/source/css-writing-modes-3/text-orientation-parsing-sideways-right-001.html Is it correct? I believe it is a correct and adequate test. " UAs may accept sideways-right as a value that computes to sideways if needed for backward compatibility reasons. " 5.1. Orienting Text: the text-orientation property https://drafts.csswg.org/css-writing-modes-3/#text-orientation Gérard
Received on Thursday, 1 October 2015 01:10:49 UTC