W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2015

Re: [css-counter-styles] emdash

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 12:32:54 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDDf+5NCxbR0wPhnjG6gJGoYKzSug6YoN6tknsOv5yOXrA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 4:09 AM, Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org> wrote:
> On 18/03/15 11:40, Xidorn Quan wrote:
>>
>> This is easy to implement for us (Gecko). The questions are, is that
>> spec stable enough to be implemented? And even we implement this, will
>> other UAs follow? If they don't follow, whatever the spec says, Daniel's
>> problem will still be there.
>
>
> As a whole, the CSS Lists level 3 spec might not be stable enough. (For
> example, I don’t know how much review the layout algorithm of `position:
> marker` has gotten.) However, this specific feature (list-style-type:
> <string>) is so straightforward that I don’t see it changing in the future.

Yes.  The layout/::marker parts are still unstable, but
list-style-type:<string> is fine.

> More generally, we often have multiple features in a given document that are
> relatively independent. It might be useful to talk about or even have
> in-spec markers for stability of individual sections.

Yeah.

~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 18 March 2015 19:33:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:30 UTC