- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 12:32:54 -0700
- To: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 4:09 AM, Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org> wrote: > On 18/03/15 11:40, Xidorn Quan wrote: >> >> This is easy to implement for us (Gecko). The questions are, is that >> spec stable enough to be implemented? And even we implement this, will >> other UAs follow? If they don't follow, whatever the spec says, Daniel's >> problem will still be there. > > > As a whole, the CSS Lists level 3 spec might not be stable enough. (For > example, I don’t know how much review the layout algorithm of `position: > marker` has gotten.) However, this specific feature (list-style-type: > <string>) is so straightforward that I don’t see it changing in the future. Yes. The layout/::marker parts are still unstable, but list-style-type:<string> is fine. > More generally, we often have multiple features in a given document that are > relatively independent. It might be useful to talk about or even have > in-spec markers for stability of individual sections. Yeah. ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 18 March 2015 19:33:41 UTC