- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 18:35:17 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 03/18/2015 12:32 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 4:09 AM, Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org> wrote: >> On 18/03/15 11:40, Xidorn Quan wrote: >>> >>> This is easy to implement for us (Gecko). The questions are, is that >>> spec stable enough to be implemented? And even we implement this, will >>> other UAs follow? If they don't follow, whatever the spec says, Daniel's >>> problem will still be there. >> >> As a whole, the CSS Lists level 3 spec might not be stable enough. (For >> example, I don’t know how much review the layout algorithm of `position: >> marker` has gotten.) However, this specific feature (list-style-type: >> <string>) is so straightforward that I don’t see it changing in the future. > > Yes. The layout/::marker parts are still unstable, but > list-style-type:<string> is fine. > >> More generally, we often have multiple features in a given document that are >> relatively independent. It might be useful to talk about or even have >> in-spec markers for stability of individual sections. > > Yeah. I agree that list-style-type: <string> is stable. We should probably trim down the Lists spec and publish with the stable bits. Started a thread on that in https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0363.html (Also, if we do want to add a keyword, it should be mdash, not emdash, since that's what the HTML entity is.) ~fantasai
Received on Friday, 20 March 2015 01:35:46 UTC