- From: Manuel Rego Casasnovas <rego@igalia.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 15:47:47 +0100
- To: www-style@w3.org
Hi, I've a doubt regarding the expected behavior of a grid using flexible lengths under different sizing constraints (min|max|fit-content or fill). Let's use the following grid as example: <style> .container { width: 100px; height: 100px; } .grid { display: grid; grid-template-columns: 1fr; grid-template-rows: 1fr; } .item { font: 10px/1 Ahem; } </style> <div class="container"> <div class="grid"> <div class="item">XXX XXX</div> </div> </div> Let's see what are the grid and item dimensions depending on the value of the grid's width and height properties: * width: auto; height: auto; => 100x10 * width: min-content; height: min-content; => 0x0 * width: max-content; height: max-content; => 70x10 * width: fit-content; height: fit-content; => 70x10 * width: fill; height: fill; => 100x100 I'd like to confirm if these are or not the right values. In order to calculate the min-content contribution of the "1fr" track, I consider we're calling the grid sizing algorithm with 0 available space, so the "1fr" becomes 0px. For the max-content contribution, I guess we're calling the algorithm with infinite available space, so the size it's based on the track contents [1], in this case the "1fr" becomes 70px. Take into account that this doesn't match with what was agreed some time ago [2]. If I understand it correctly, in that case you'll only run the algorithm once using 0 as available space. So, "1fr" will be 0px for both min-content and max-content contributions. What do you think? Thanks for your time, Rego [1] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-grid/#fr-unit [2] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Oct/0054.html
Received on Thursday, 12 March 2015 14:48:21 UTC